tomorrow'snews today! and info...

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - SCOTUSblog
Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service An area is eligible for designation as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 only if it is habitat for the listed species; and the decision by the secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior not to exclude an area from critical habitat under 16 U. S. C. §1533(b)(2) is subject to judicial review.
Supreme Court Ruling Favors Sports Betting - The New York ...
The case concerned New Jersey, but it has implications for other states eager to allow and tax sports gambling. Americans are estimated to annually place $150 billion in illegal wagers on sports.
Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker in same-sex wedding ...
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a cake to celebrate the marriage of a same sex couple because of a religious objection.
Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark U.S. constitutional law, campaign finance, and corporate law case dealing with regulation of political campaign spending by organizations. The United States Supreme Court held (5–4) on January 21, 2010, that the free speech clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution prohibits the government from ...
Massachusetts Court System | Mass.gov
The Massachusetts court system resembles a pyramid. Cases commence in one of the 7 trial court departments, and are first decided there. Cases are initiated in the particular court which has subject matter and geographic jurisdiction over the issues and parties involved.
Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act ...
The Supreme Court split along ideological lines with its ruling that Congress had not provided adequate justification for subjecting the states, mostly in the South, to federal oversight.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
2 v. HODGES OBERGEFELL Syllabus titioners’ own experiences. Pp. 3–6. (2) The history of marriage is one of both continuity and change. Changes, such as the decline of arranged marriages and the aban
Supreme Court rules gay couples nationwide have a right to ...
A deeply divided Supreme Court on Friday delivered a historic victory for gay rights, ruling 5 to 4 that the Constitution requires that same-sex couples be allowed to marry no matter where they live.
Bush v. Gore - Wikipedia
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election.The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring. Eight days earlier, the Court unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush v.
Obergefell v. Hodges - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court released orders from the November 30 conference on Monday; the justices called for the views of the U.S. solicitor general in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. v. Upstate Forever.. On Monday, the justices heard oral argument in Dawson v.Steager and Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission.